The Cellar - View Single Post - Windows XP pro upgrade: ridiculously horrible

jaguar · 01-28-2002, 05:36 AM

I know fat32 is fucking ugly, but i've tried both, and technicial aside, i'm sorry but it simply is faster.

NTFS support is mostly guessowrk under linux, and msft keep subtly changing it so its impossible to get it perfect. I had hell rescueing stuff off NTFS drives before.

ME btw is truely foul, and under no circumstnaces be put on anything, 98 is far better.

I looked at that site, where is NTFS stuff?
I tried win2k/NT infomation and source.

01-28-2002, 05:36 AM	#25
jaguar whig Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 5,075	I know fat32 is fucking ugly, but i've tried both, and technicial aside, i'm sorry but it simply is faster. NTFS support is mostly guessowrk under linux, and msft keep subtly changing it so its impossible to get it perfect. I had hell rescueing stuff off NTFS drives before. ME btw is truely foul, and under no circumstnaces be put on anything, 98 is far better. I looked at that site, where is NTFS stuff? I tried win2k/NT infomation and source. __________________ Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain Last edited by jaguar; 01-28-2002 at 05:40 AM.