Let's do this, then. Here's a fair question.
IMO, the losers are the ones who inflict the violence in this scenario. That's my position and it's also the position of rule of law.
So under what conditions, in America, is it acceptable to strike an unarmed diminutive Asian guy standing on the side of the street filming you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luce
But Ngo wasn't a victim. He intentionally orchestrated that event
|
Please tell us how. He wasn't being provocative... unarmed, non-threatening, not saying a word, not doing anything, just filming them. Do you figure they are allowed to strike him because they didn't like what he showed on his videos, or what he said about them? Be honest.
Quote:
|
and then lied about his injuries.
|
The people using weapons, striking him, causing him to bleed, be taken to the hospital, held overnight, these are all facts. Most of them are on videos that I've personally watched in order to verify what's going on.
That's actually enough for me. I don't need him to have a brain hemorrhage to identify the losers in this scenario, but please, if you know he
lied about having a hemorrhage, let us know how you know.