Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SteveDallas
Are you saying that the Economist is now taking an anti-Bush stance? Please explain.
In any event, I seriously doubt anti-Bush voters need to be motivated. Most of us have been waiting to go vote since December 2000.  |
This wasn't a conclusion reached by
The Economist, but rather
an economist - a Yale economist to be specific.
What i was saying before is that sometimes the best way to motivate and turn people to your view, is to present your cause as being the underdog - thus providing further motivation to those who may agree with you already, but are generally to lazy to be troubled with voting.
but to answer your question about
The Economist...
Reported by The Economist