Quote:
Originally posted by mulgorod
I don't know a lot about guns, but I'm going to note that Lost Viking isn't far off the mark on this one. This isn't a lot of weaponry.
|
The point was to make Arafat appear to be a terrorist. But even the White House stocks more arms than are displayed here. Perspective. The White House is not even in a war zone but stocks far more weapons. Arafat's people are suppose to protect him in a war zone. Pathetic how few arms the Palestinians had to protect themselves from the army of an officially declared racist nation.
So what is a terrorist? People whose protection forces stock arms to protect their citizens? Then most police departments in America would qualify as terrorist organizations. In a meeting of 57 Islamic nations in SE Aisa, all but two even refuse to declare suicide bombers as terrorists. The only two to agree with George Jr are Bosnia and Malaysia.
So what is a terrorist? The one point acknowledged to be wrong, even by America's closest allies, is that George Jr's definition of terrorist is flawed if not just naive. What is a terrorist? Someone who stocks these weapons?