Quote:
|
Another city council member said it wouldn't be fair to local businesses that pay rent in strip malls, etc.
|
The council member that said that is so fucking retarded its beyond belief. Why is party A who rents private property from Party B put at a disadvantage when Party X (Radar) rents private property from Party Z? What if, by extraordinary co-incidence, Party B owns both parcels? Please characterize the disadvantage in that scenario. Also, please explain how Party Z (landlord of the 2nd parcel) is not put at a disadvantage by being prohibited from putting his/her land to its highest and best use by being permitted to lease to Party X? That amounts to an economic subsidy to Party B from Party X. Pure, unadulterated BS.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I will never live in California. That, and mud. And Jeanine Garafolo.