View Single Post
Old 04-16-2005, 10:25 AM   #4
Radar
Constitutional Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
Quote:
US v. Kokinda... sorry, but you or whoever aren't going to win.
That case doesn't apply since I wasn't soliciting. I was giving out political information without any request for support or money (as mentioned in the case). Political speech is the most protected speech and the first amendment most definately applies. Also we did not hamper, impede, harass, or disrupt the postal business of anyone. So again, this case does not apply.

The Supreme Court is subservient to the U.S. Constitution. They don't define it. They merely made sure the actions of government comply with it. In this case, I own the land, and I was exercising my RIGHT to free speech and my RIGHT to gather on government land as protected by the U.S. Constitution. I don't require permission to exercise my rights.

Also I find it laughable that a mental midget like lookout would accuse anyone else of finding difficulty grasping reality. This dumb fuck couldn't find his ass with both hands.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death."
- George Carlin
Radar is offline   Reply With Quote