Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lady Sidhe
"it will inflame the jury--therefore these photos will not be allowed"
|
Showing graphic photos to a jury can only appeal to thier emotional side. It will anger them and make them want to find someone to blame it on, even if that person didn't commit the crime. They are more likely to convict when shown bloody photos. If the photos don't convery any information other than "a brutal murder took place," there is no need to show the jury.
The testimony of the coroner, crime scene investigator, etc. should be enough in most cases. If there is a dispute about the facts, and the photos address those facts, then sure, show the jury the photos.
Once a person has been found guilty and the penalty is being discussed, then it's appropriate to show the photos around. Let them judge the severity of the crime by looking at the scene.