The Cellar - View Single Post

lookout123 · 07-21-2005, 12:20 PM

and the problem with that judgement is what? he basically said that the cops were probably being dumbasses, but they followed the law, and further, the law was not unconstitutional.

i was reading some things about Roberts' previous confirmation hearing and it is now clear why Schumer has a woody for Roberts'. In the previous hearings Schumer kept asking personal preference questions (such as he wants answered now), Roberts repeatedly deferred, as is his right, and Schumer kept going and going until Roberts said, "now that is a dumbass question." everybody laughed. he went on to apologize and ask Schumer not to take personal offense, but "i've got a lot of experience spotting dumbass questions, and that is definitely a dumbass question". more laughter.

Roberts' made people laugh and no senator is likely to forget that.

07-21-2005, 12:20 PM	#3
lookout123 changed his status to single Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Right behind you. No, the other side. Posts: 10,308	and the problem with that judgement is what? he basically said that the cops were probably being dumbasses, but they followed the law, and further, the law was not unconstitutional. i was reading some things about Roberts' previous confirmation hearing and it is now clear why Schumer has a woody for Roberts'. In the previous hearings Schumer kept asking personal preference questions (such as he wants answered now), Roberts repeatedly deferred, as is his right, and Schumer kept going and going until Roberts said, "now that is a dumbass question." everybody laughed. he went on to apologize and ask Schumer not to take personal offense, but "i've got a lot of experience spotting dumbass questions, and that is definitely a dumbass question". more laughter. Roberts' made people laugh and no senator is likely to forget that. __________________ Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin