View Single Post
Old 07-25-2005, 01:47 PM   #42
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123
Marichiko - any time you take green troops with only basic combat skills and align them against a bloodied but experienced opponent there will be some mistakes made at a tactical level. so what is your point? what should Pershing have done? i don't want a hindsight view of things - this was real war, real bullets, real time. you never know exactly what your opponent has, is thinking, is doing - you only have what you think they have, are thinking, are doing.

so with that backdrop - what better way did Pershing have to end the war?

and BTW - citing foreign military command's opinions of American leadership strengths and weaknesses is not exactly flawless. i seem to remember quotes from British officers complaining about the American's absolute ignorance of the proper use of infantry. that may have been during the revolutionary war.
That was several quotes, the last one from an American officer. Pershing trained American troops in Paris for 6 months before committing them to battle. This was another complaint the allies had against him - the inordinate (to them) length of time before Pershing would commit his divisions. You can have very experienced soldiers, but they will die just like raw troops when forced to make stupid battleground stances.
  Reply With Quote