Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Undertoad
That's a load of hooey and you can't see it because you believe that gun restrictions, expansion of the federal death penalty, increased taxes, the DMCA, and attacking Bosnia, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Waco, TX were necessary courses of action and not at all restricting freedom.
As long as they separate church and state, I guess. Well except for Waco, I guess.
|
You seem to be on "hooey" overload today, UT. Clinton attacks "Bosnia, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq" and he was wrong? Bush attacks Iraq and he was right? You've lost me.
As far as Clinton being a champion for the cause of a national medical care program versus Bush's stance on stem cell research, abstinence-only education, and intelligent design, among others: The last I heard, there is no religous group that pushes national health care as part of their agenda. Although the thought of national health care makes you break out in "hooey" fits, UT, a rational, scientific argument can be made in its favor. Not so with the Bush issues, which are backed largely by fundamentalist Christian nut case groups.
