Quote:
Originally Posted by OnyxCougar
Since there are flameless ways to light cigarettes, I would have argued, as the prosecution, that the defendant could take advantage of those devices and therefore maintain his rights to smoke.
Sheesh.
|
And of course we still have the situation of people asking others for a light which generally works quite well and once the cigarette of the arsonist is lit, well....
The whole thing is crazy and the fact that we have a Human Rights law that is used to argue the case instead of the 'he can get a light anyway' approach doesn't improve matters one bit