View Single Post
Old 12-04-2005, 09:27 AM   #15
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Am I the only one who doesn't see anything wrong with this? You can be absolutely sure that the camera didn't point into the stalls or get any footage that could be close to construed as pornographic. This story would be all about that if it did. Many public restrooms also have cameras in them for security reasons. The kid wasn't necessarily wrong in taking it down, although I think he was wrong to steal it. He should have simply disabled it or returned it to the school office if he wanted to make a statement. But in the end, that's all it gets to be, is a statement, and maybe a public relations nightmare. The school has every legal right to put the camera there as long as it's not pointed at the stalls or urinals.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote