Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Uh....question........how does he know it will only go to 98' and not 100'.
Guess that's something you only find out once.  |
It was probably stated originally as 30 m, which is 98' when the "extact" conversion is rounded off to the nearest foot. Considering the relative precision of the initial figure, likely a simple multiple of 5 or 10, it
should have been rounded to 100' instead.