Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tw
I don't understand your point. Stories about threats from Iraq predated 1990. So what? We are not talking about a time when the NY Times provided both background of the threat and reasons why the threat did not exist. We are discussing a time when the NY Times literally quashed or buried (in back pages) stories that factually demonstrated George Jr myths of a Saddam threat.
|
My point is that I'm going to actually read the NYT completely more often. There have been times that they say things that have turned out to be less than truthful and have been ridiculed for it.
I'm sure that they do excellent reporting in the "old, factual" way. It's now on my favs list to read.
Sorry for the late reply but when I get the call to split, I'm normally scrambling to get on scene and set up for about a month.
Cheney says Wie Gehts....er, I mean Hello.