|
Guest
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tw
It is a public area. I must leave only because smokers have rights? In fact, I am denied access to or driven out of most bars only because of their addiction. You have it completely backwards. Should I have to leave only because my skin is black? No difference. Both actions are a threat to my safety only because they want to smoke? Walk away? I have been doing that too many decades only because drug addicts have all the rights?
Who gets ill right then because they are smoking? Who has a headache sometimes before I can detect the odor. They have the right to physically attack my body? I should have to walk away from my beer only because they are so intolerant, addicted, and toxic? You have it backwards. I should be tolerant of their intolerance? I should be denied access to any restaurant? Maybe they will sell me food out the back door? Who then is the nigger?
|
A bar or restaurant is private property, not public. If the owner wants smoking allowed, how is it anyone's business?
I smoke a pipe and/or cigar about twice a week, I am not addicted to anything nor am I "toxic", LOL!
A little insight on the "new study" and "new announcement" by the Surgeon Gen. BTW.
Sucks that part of being free is having to deal with other's acting free as well, some can't deal. Private property should have meaning.
Funny thing is that you know that most establishments would have a non-smoking area... antis just like to bitch.
Some examples of what they are like when the come into the cigar forums.
People who don't belive in freedom... just from this week:
Anti-smoker posts...
Quote:
From: F~A~R~V~A: The Original Bastard - view profile
Date: Mon, Jul 3 2006 6:10 pm
Email: "F~A~R~V~A: The Original Bastard" <flyhighfreeeb...@aol.compost>
Groups: alt.smokers.cigars, alt.pro-wrestling.nwo
Not yet ratedRating:
show options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
you are the dumbest damn people alive....why don't you suck on the business
end of a handgun now and save taxpayers the millions they contribute to
medicare because of your stupidity....second hand smoke kills the innocent!
smokers = nazis!
--
"Kick him when he's down, he's easier to reach."
---Scott Hall
#1 ranked poster in RSPW history....
.....NEVER SHIT A SHITTER!
=> UPDATE -- NATIONWIDE SMOKING BAN coming to the U$A !! <= yeeeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
From: BTR1701 - view profile
Date: Tues, Jun 27 2006 8:42 pm
Email: BTR1701 <btr1...@ix.netcom.com>
Groups: alt.law-enforcement, alt.smokers, alt.smokers.cigars, alt.smokers.pipes, can.talk.smoking, misc.legal, us.politics
Rating: (1 user)
show options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
In article <Ebdog.19$3P.45...@news.uswest.net>,
"=> Vox Populi©" <v...@popu.li> wrote:
> UPDATE -New US report calls for workplace smoking ban
> WASHINGTON, June 27 (Reuters) - Second-hand smoke clearly kills people and
> the only way to control it is to ban all smoking in workplaces, the U.S.
> Surgeon-General said on Tuesday in report that puts the Bush administration
> on the side of smoking restrictions.
I wonder if this would extend to people whose homes are their
workplaces. Could someone like Stephen King, who writes his books in his
home, be told by the government that he's prohibited from smoking there
because it's a "workplace"?
Gee, I hope so. There's nothing like the heavy hand of the government
running even the smallest aspect of one's personal life. Gives me a warm
fuzzy feeling at the thought of the possibility...
=> Lowlife Smokers out in the RAIN ! <= yeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaaa VICTORY!
All 3 messages in topic - view as tree
From: => Vox Populi© - view profile
Date: Mon, Jul 3 2006 12:41 am
Email: "=> Vox Populi©" <v...@popu.li>
Groups: alt.law-enforcement, alt.smokers, alt.smokers.cigars, alt.smokers.pipes, can.talk.smoking, co.general, co.politics
Not yet ratedRating:
show options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
Bwhahahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
Just 24 hours after the Colorado statewide ban on
indoor smoking took effect, one can witness groups
of lowlife tobacco-sucking addicts standing OUTSIDE
IN THE RAIN, suck suck suuuuucking on their putrid
cancer sticks -- even in the seediest dirtball dive bars
on Colfax ave, the Esquire, the Squire, etc ... the maggots
are now finally kicked to the filthy gutter with the other
junkies and crackheads, where they belong!
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
VICTORY at LAST !@!
Reply » Rate this post: Text for clearing space
From: Boomshiki - view profile
Date: Mon, Jul 3 2006 12:59 am
Email: "Boomshiki" <RayL...@gmail.com>
Groups: alt.law-enforcement, alt.smokers, alt.smokers.cigars, alt.smokers.pipes, can.talk.smoking, co.general, co.politics
Not yet ratedRating:
show options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
Congradulations.
A prejudice based on habbit is not exactly something to celebrate however.
"=> Vox Populi©" <v...@popu.li> wrote in message
news:Nc1qg.66$g34.8645@news.uswest.net...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Bwhahahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
> Just 24 hours after the Colorado statewide ban on
> indoor smoking took effect, one can witness groups
> of lowlife tobacco-sucking addicts standing OUTSIDE
> IN THE RAIN, suck suck suuuuucking on their putrid
> cancer sticks -- even in the seediest dirtball dive bars
> on Colfax ave, the Esquire, the Squire, etc ... the maggots
> are now finally kicked to the filthy gutter with the other
> junkies and crackheads, where they belong!
> Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
> VICTORY at LAST !@!
Reply » Rate this post: Text for clearing space
From: => Vox Populi© - view profile
Date: Mon, Jul 3 2006 1:03 am
Email: "=> Vox Populi©" <v...@popu.li>
Groups: alt.law-enforcement, alt.smokers, alt.smokers.cigars, alt.smokers.pipes, can.talk.smoking, co.general, co.politics
Not yet ratedRating:
show options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
"Boomshiki" <RayL...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:uu1qg.36554$B91.35538@edtnps82...
> Congradulations.
> A prejudice based on habbit is not exactly something to celebrate however.
It's ok to be prejudiced against lowlife tobacco addicts ... since
that prejudice is deserved and accurate.
|
That is the mentality of who we are dealing with.
Last edited by rkzenrage; 07-04-2006 at 01:09 PM.
|