Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Beestie
Could also be a funding issue. Possible (not making an assertion about this particular case) that a higher ratio of "autistic" students means a bigger share of state allocation of earmarked funds. Just making the point that there could be an incentive to widen the net as to what constitutes autism.
|
As far as autism vs another label, there are 14 specific labels that IDEA lists and they should all be funded similarly. The sheer number of children with autism does create a political constituency so it may be easier to get money for that label. I think that some kids who used to be labeled with a behavior disorder are now being more appropriately labeled autistic. Lots of kids have multiple labels and since autism is the hot topic right now, that's where the focus is. I saw kids come into the Unit with milder traits and leave in months without any of the tell-tale behaviors, but they're still labeled and might not "look" autistic. Early intervention is where its at.
I'd also agree with Bullits idea. Parents will move to get their kid in a decent program increasing numbers in particular districts.