Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spexxvet
That's pretty plain - what's your confusion?
|
You started off by representing that an adequate minimum wage would solve the homeless problem.
Asked what that "adequate" wage would be, you blew smoke for a while then quoted about $10/hr (comparable to places like the UK and France, where of course they have utterly no problems with either unemployment or homelessness).
Then when I pointed out that you'd trimmed the original scope of what was "adequate", you said "Well, of course that's not enough, The government should feed everyone and pay for it with wealth redistribution."
Stick with one position, please. You got a foot in the door with "raise the minimum wage" and now we've slippery-sloped to "eat the rich".