Quote:
Originally posted by hermit22
Maggie, you've proven that you don't like to read my posts before you comment on them. I did answer his questions. Go back and read my posts and you'll see that.
|
I read it repeatedly, I don't see any answer to Tony's second question....unless it's possibly buried in that incoherent sentence about missiles and taxicabs. I can only make that tentative connection because it's possible you might think a JDAM is a missile, and because you're saying you did respond to the question. It's a huge reach, though. How a taxicab might enter into this I have no idea.
"Appropriate action taking place under credible means" almost sounds like English but it fails to scan, for me at least. Actions don't take place "under" means. Actions might possibly be executed *by* means, the means being the instrumentatilty of the action. But I have no clue as to which actions and means you're referring to.
Can you paraphrase your response more directly? Remeber, the question was "<i>If at the end of all this studying and understanding, we find that they have deeply-held but irrational beliefs that all the Jews and westerners should all be killed or enslaved, would it *then* be okay to inform them of our counter-opinion via JDAM?</I>"
"Yes" or "No, because..." might be understandable answers.
Just on background, a JDAM is a Joint Direct Attack Munition, an air-launched precision-guided gravity bomb.