Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaggieL
I'll take that as a "no".
|
Title says wackos promoted the "Pearl Harboring" of Iraq in 2002 and now support a lying president using gospels from Rush Limbaugh. New Cellar dwellers may not appreciate repeated references to "Pearl Harboring". It was cited specifically in a post to MaggieL in 2002 when she advocated a 'big dic' agenda - the "Mission Accomplished" war. The Iraq war was defined as the “Pearl Harboring of a sovereign nation”. Guess what. That is exactly what it is complete with nothing but lies to justify it – just like in 1941.
The title is correct. Facts say that title is inevitable. Title reminds us how 'big dics' got US and UK into two quagmires – deja vue Vietnam. Title reminds us how wacko extremists even now refuse to admit both wars are being lost.
Gen Dannatt specifically cites why an Australian patrol was attacked. They left; so why did they come back? Patriotic Iraqis attacked that Australian patrol only because Australians were there. This is what Iraqis want from a US and UK military occupation.
What has happened in Iraq was predicted by those who confronted MaggieL back in 2002. She now takes offense of what is inevitable? Victory in Iraq is no longer possible - no matter how the 'big dics' lie about it. British to withdraw from Iraq is inevitable because victory is no longer possible.
MaggieL - I was just taking to another ex-Marine. He now records a running daily total of America soldier killed in Iraq. At least someone here has been standing up for American troops. You don't. Now wonder you only post sound byte insults. What you advocate for American troops is shameful - because your political agenda is more important than America.