Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Clodfobble
It was not "Rumsfeld to Resign." Do you see the difference?
|
I do not see the difference. MaggieL posts to confuse – to diffuse a reality that confronts her biases; that exposes more than four years of her war mongering posts as wrong. Like PA’s Senator Rick Santorum, MaggieL has been promoting things that are bad for American soldiers – to promote a failed political agenda.
Britain’s number one General calls for "British to Withdraw from Iraq". Where is that title wrong? It is not. It clearly defines the topic. MaggieL is posting deception - including errors about the General's backtracking – so that you will ignore reality. She complains about the title so that you don’t ask, “MaggieL, when do we find Saddam’s WMDs?” So that you ignore her guilty advocations for more war and for torture.
MaggieL hopes you also forget that all American Generals who served in Iraq and are now retired have been calling for the same thing. Iraq is not winnable. It was lost in the first six months when Tobias was there. See how Iraq was being lost even in his 2003 posts.
MaggieL cannot even admit that Saddam did not have WMDs. Her contrarian claims were based only in myths and lies. Proof for WMDs did not exist. MaggieL cannot even admit that fact. She cannot admit a "Mission Accomplished" war was advocated only by and for a political agenda. So she nitpicks.
The title is 100% correct. General Sir Richard Dannatt calls for "British to Withdraw from Iraq". Rather than admit reality, MaggieL attacks the title using Rush Limbaugh spin; so that reality will be ignored. When relevant facts are push right back at her, then she promotes more myths such as Gen Dannatt backtracking. He is not. But this same MaggieL cannot admit to an only reason Saddam had WMDs – lies promoted for a political agenda.
The title is 100% correct. MaggieL will argue irrelevant – just like Rush – to avoid admitting realities such as attacks on Americans every 15 minutes will only increase. Such realities say her political agenda was a lie.
Since we will not deploy 500,000 troops now, then General Dannatt notes that “British to Withdraw from Iraq” is necessary. Again, the title is 100% correct. MaggieL is wrong - again arguing semantics to ignore how wrong “Mission Accomplished” always was. Maybe you will also forget that she advocates torture, secret prisons, suspension of Writ of Habeas Corpus, violation of principles upon which America was founded… Maybe you will forget that she still sees no difference between Tojo in Pearl Harbor and "Pearl Harboring of Iraq". So she nitpicks about a title. Nitpickings and credibility are not same. But MaggieL nitipicks anyway.