Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
tw's doing a Rush Limbaugh imitation, with his "falling off a mountain" sound (written) byte he picked up, and trying to convince everyone they must answer to him.
|
Well xoxoxoBruce - had you spent only a few dollars or a few hours in the library, then you would have known what that expression meant. It is a benchmark. One who denies global warming also never bothered to learn even basic concepts associated with global warming. Demonstrated again is also why a president could lie about WMDs - and some foolishly and automatically believe the liar. Automatically know a fact without first learning facts? Only those who hate America would do that.
The expression is well understood when one first learns the science (before having conclusions). "falling off the mountain" discusses a potential disaster due to global warming. xoxoxoBruce also denies the threat of global warming. And yet he could not even read one Scientific American issue that discusses the concept in layman's terms. He knows - but did not first learn? Like every poster who somehow knows this global warming problem does not exist - xoxoxoBruce also so not know what "falling off the mountain means".
This post will not change xoxoxoBruce's opinion. His conclusion was made long before he learned any facts. But other should appreciate where this denial of global warming comes from: ignorance. Some just know - facts and numbers be damned.
Meanwhile 'smoking gun' evidence of man’s contribution to global warming is now defacto science. It is only denied by ... well how many more don't even know what "falling off the mountain" means?