Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie
Interesting.
In one thread you support the Bush administration's covert domestic spying campaign despite the Constitutional prohibitions against it.
|
No dicotomy here, one is specifically designed to combat terroristic activity the other deals specifically with crime. Huge frigging difference.
Quote:
In another thread you scream George Orwell on England's above-board, anything-but-covert surveillance of public property.
|
Cool, please post my link where I "scream George Orwell" anything. All I did was post a thought which linked a movie, no screaming, just thought provoking. The movie was an over the top example of mind control, hardly compares. And I stated that I had mixed opinions about it. Neither one side or the other on monitoring for
local crime control, again a HUGE difference between that and monitoring for
TERRORISTIC ACTIVITY.
Quote:
I'll take a camera watching me pick my nose while crossing the street over having my bank statements, phone records, credit card activity and internet/email logs demanded without a warrant and submitted without my knowlege or consent to the same irresponsible government bozos who sat on their fat asses eating jelly donuts while terrorists were training right under their noses any damn day.
|
little bit of mixing up your facts there but ok, I'll take your word that you are paranoid.
Quote:
Speaking of talking points, I think I hear your fax maching ringing. If you had that thing where faxes could come right into your computer, you could just cut and paste your reply to this post rather than having to retype it. Just a thought.
|
Hmmmmmm..... ok, what ever the hell that response is to imply.