Quote:
Originally Posted by Ibram
PROOF! cold, hard PROOF that UG simply is tw!
|
Bizzaro tw. He posts and yet never makes a single point.
Urbane Guerrilla promised to read Thomas P.M. Barnett's Blueprint For Action: A Future Worth Creating ... since November 2006. "
So far, I'm fascinated. I'll probably be talking about this book's ideas from time to time. ." Then he discovered reality is a wee too complex - especially when reality dismembers his "political agendas".
Asked why he stopped reading a book that contradicts his "political agendas", Urbane Guerrilla responded, "
Tw, shut your yap. I checked Barnett back out of the library". Two months later means either the book is still too difficult (Barnett is a comprehensive military analyst) or that Urbane Guerrilla learned how erroneous his "political agendas" really are.
Demonstrated in UG’s long post is his problem. He knows only because he can post long. His long post is irrelevant to his conclusion. His conclusion is that one side is good; the other is evil. The "decent UG" (as he defined himself) can easily judge what is good and evil because UG is decent and therefore knows. His proof? That long irrelevant history of how Israel got created.
Obviously how Israel got created proves nothing about "good and evil". Since he cannot grasp that, then UG also had no idea that Thomas Barnett was also discussing stupidity and incompetence in George Jr's administration. Urbane Guerrilla said he would be discussing Barnett's book because UG had no idea what he was reading. UG again could not associate the long and complex logic with a conclusion. So UG assumes Barnett's conclusion is UG's "political agenda".
Barnett also discusses the foolishness of 'big dic' thinking; their inability to think strategically. Barnett defined UG: a person who confuses tactical perspectives with strategic thinking. 'Big dics' such as UG are a classic example of myopic thinking. Barnett's points are long, complex, and too difficult for UG to understand. UG even confuses historical stories as proof of "good vs evil". So UG applied his biases (ie he always knows what is good and what is evil), reads the conclusions he can understand, and then assumed what Barnett was saying.
No wonder UG confuses the numbers killed in the holocaust with justification of zionism in the Middle East. That simplicity demonstrates why UG could not understand even Chapter One from Thomas Barnett - who is also critical of UG types that use a simplistic 'big dic' political agenda as if that were logical proof.
Like Bizzaro Superman, UG believes superhuman long posts means he is smart. His conclusions have little relation to his posts. He could not even see that Barnett was criticizing UG's thinking. UG simplistically believes that UG is decent and therefore UG can always tell the difference between 'good and evil'.
UG, when do you discuss Thomas Barnett’s book? But you promised?