View Single Post
Old 05-07-2007, 03:55 PM   #26
Radar
Constitutional Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
I'm amazed at how few "legal professionals" know anything about the U.S. Constitution. I personally know more about it than any Supreme Court Justice to serve in the last 50-100 years. I'm not being facetious or trying to brag. I'm stating a fact based on the overwhelmingly bad decisions they've made (many of which directly contradict the Constitution) and the fact that this court has deemed that they can allow violations of the Constitution when they deem it in the government's "interests".

I love how lawyers claim that my "interpretation" of the Constitution is wrong when I don't "interpret" it, and neither should the Supreme Court. The Constitution doesn't require interpretation. It is written in simple English and it's not vague or ambiguous in any way. It means exactly what it says and nothing more or nothing less.

The Constitution says that the federal government may only legislate or take part in what is specifically enumerated and that the federal government is PROHIBITED from doing anything that is not enumerated. The federal government is PROHIBITED from having "implied powers".

More than 80% of what the federal government does is unconstitutional.

It's a shame so few lawyers can comprehend this.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death."
- George Carlin
Radar is offline   Reply With Quote