View Single Post
Old 03-04-2003, 08:57 PM   #2
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
I agree with the Supreme Court. Augusta and the Boy Scouts are what I would consider "social clubs." They are private groups that are non-essential to a person's well-being. Therefore, they have the right to admit whomever they choose...and if you don't fit the mold, sorry. Form your own club then. And I think this is beneficial to all in the end...I would say the NAACP formed due to such (a) situation(s).

And I would say that the means are just as valid if tangential. If I want to start a beer drinking group that only allows guys over age 27 with goattees to participate, then that's my prerogative. As I see it, we form relationships with people with whom we share interests. Over time, in order to protect those relationships, we may attempt to make it more exclusive...by creating rules that make it hard for any outsider to get in. This example could (sorta) be applied to marriage.

(For the record, I think the Scouts and Augusta are smoking crack. The Scouts in particular disgust me. I spent 14 years in that organization, and it's become a laughing stock.)
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote