Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
Clearly they did.
|
The reserve units deployed to Abu Ghriad had no dogs. Just because the Army has dogs proves that reserve units in Abu Ghriad had dogs? Well yes when TheMercenary must say anything to blame the enlisted men; claim that Rumsfeld, Miller, et al were totally innocent. Clearly those with his wacko extremist agendas did not condemn Taguba for reporting the truth. And that is TheMercenary's political agenda. Lying is important when his sexual preferences are more important than reality.
TheMercenary - did you have multiple organisms when all those naked bodies were piled together? You previously called that patriotism. But then another already suggested you are a pedophile who wants to do Duck Duck.
This post now in the tone of the new Cellar that started with TheMercenary's postings. Demonising as Rush Limbaugh does and ask TheMercenary does with Hitlery is now acceptable in The Cellar. Now longer is reality more important than a political agenda - and hate.
Since other units in the Army had dogs, then that proved reserve units in Abu Ghriad were also deployed with dogs. After all, a poitical agenda proves it.