Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
The reserve units deployed to Abu Ghriad had no dogs. Just because the Army has dogs proves that reserve units in Abu Ghriad had dogs? Well yes when TheMercenary must say anything to blame the enlisted men; claim that Rumsfeld, Miller, et al were totally innocent. Clearly those with his wacko extremist agendas did not condemn Taguba for reporting the truth. And that is TheMercenary's political agenda. Lying is important when his sexual preferences are more important than reality.
TheMercenary - did you have multiple organisms when all those naked bodies were piled together? You previously called that patriotism. But then another already suggested you are a pedophile who wants to do Duck Duck.
This post now in the tone of the new Cellar that started with TheMercenary's postings. Demonising as Rush Limbaugh does and ask TheMercenary does with Hitlery is now acceptable in The Cellar. Now longer is reality more important than a political agenda - and hate.
Since other units in the Army had dogs, then that proved reserve units in Abu Ghriad were also deployed with dogs. After all, a poitical agenda proves it.
|
Well see the problem here is that you have no real experience on which to base your statements. Because one reserve unit was at the prison does not really say much. How about the other units that were stationed there? how about the MPs? Intell guys? Medical support? One area has numerous deployed and assigned people. Most MP orgainzations have dogs.
800th MP Brigade
320th MP Battalion
372nd MP Company
OGA's
"Much of the abuse was conducted by members of the 372nd military police company who arrived at the prison in September, but the documents record the presence, direction and participation of military intelligence as well. They also describe members of covert intelligence agencies and military units hiding some detainees"
http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/...uba_Report.pdf
http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=396