I'm sick of this,
Creationism has the same opportunity that evolution had when it was seen as nutty as creationism is seen now.
Present your hypothesis (I have yet to see it presented in a scientific manner) so that it can be peer-reviewed.
That is how a theory happens... the ONLY way!!!!!!
If another scientist cannot recreate your results, the same way you did, guess what, your shit ends there, end of story, no theory, no lectures, no nothing, laughing stock... that is the first and, really, only step past hypothesis to theory, peer-review.
Then, others review your work, their work, do it for themselves, then apply it differently, change it for different, but similar results, write papers as well... then the theory becomes "accepted".
That is all creationists have to do.
I REALLY, HONESTLY, DO NOT see what they are COMPLAINING about!!!!!
Just do the science and then all this crap will just GO AWAY!!!
I don't want to hear any nutty bullshit about faith.
You want to be seen as a science then do science.
You want to be a faith, then shut-up and get out of the pool and go play in the sandbox with the other religions.
Again, it REALLY IS that simple.
Quote:
|
I'd bet money that the vast majority of the faithful are pretty ambivalent on the debate between scientists and creation activists, despite rkzenrage's attempts to lump all Christians into one camp.
|
I have never done that. You know nothing about me.
I have issues with a great deal about Religion, not people of faith. The two have nothing to do with each other.
My son is less likely to hear about creationism, at all, at his Episcopal school (that brags about teaching to kids of all faiths and flies flags of 24 faiths in it's lobby, all the faiths of it's kids), than in the FL public school system. The Episcopal church backs Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and teaches pure Evolution.