So, it appears to suit tw's extremist agenda to directly blame me, in coastal California, for crimes committed by people I hadn't heard of before this week in Pennsylvania.
Mecum omnes ridete.
Are those protecting democracy and making genocide impracticable caused to murder by whatever arms they come into possession of? This is the argument of a madman or a superstition-ridden fool, but not of the sane nor well-advised. Tw, I think, is afraid to own a gun and have a killing tool at his disposal. Given his general cast of thought, this is understandable. Those of calmer mind such as myself do not have tw's problems with personal arms.
These people's problems did NOT spring from the guns they owned -- but because these people were a family of dingdongs, and
then they thought of buying guns. This is something tw is now in the unhappy position of never admitting he understands. For all I know, he actually does not understand it, given, again, his cast of thought. This is a man who peddles half truths because he doesn't know any better.
Tw continues in his underlying hobby: disgracing himself in the eyes of the Cellar and its more enlightened correspondents, inviting obloquy gratuitously as a form of self-flagellation -- his ongoing zest for this suggests he really ought to get into bondage -- and embarrassing any cause whose standard he hoists.
Ali: not colonpopcorncolon, but coloncorncolon:
.