Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123
Radar, take a breath. Not everyone who disagrees with you is an inbred idiot. You have an interpretation of the constitution that you have built your whole view on. That's cool. But it isn't nearly as black and white as you like to believe. If it was you would find more people who agree with you. Your constitutional support for the argument is ambiguous at best. Saying it isn't over and over and calling the opposition stupid doesn't make it more black and white.
|
It actually is a black and white issue. The Constitution is written in black and white and it means what it says, not what the Supreme Court wants it to say, or what anti-immigrant crowds want it to say. Those who can't comprehend the very straightforward and simple words in the Constitution or worse yet, try to find a way around it or who attempt to confuse the issue by debating the meaning of a punctuation mark or a single word.
The Constitution NEVER granted any authority whatsoever to the federal government to create or enforce immigration laws. All federal immigration laws are unconstitutional. There is no gray area. It's a fact and all who deny it are doing so either because they are too stupid to comprehend the meaning of the Constitution or because they are dishonest scumbags who want to try grant government unlimited powers as long as those powers are used to satisfy their own personal agenda such as racism or xenophobia.