Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint
Doesn't the Bible define faith as belief despite a total lack of evidence?
|
Ummmm ... no. Unless I'm missing something, the biblical use of the word "faith" relies heavily on induction as the basis for belief. It repeatedly talks about the created world as an evidential basis for believing in both God and in a moral order. That appeal to reference the natural world would make no sense if the highest biblical value was to believe something was true in the total absence of evidence.
Quote:
|
This new "rational faith" is so watered down it renders the conversation meaningless.
|
This "new" rational faith is at least as old as Descartes (Aquinas, even?). I realize it's more fun to go bashing fundamentalists (I'll join in, if you'd like) for upholding faith as something opposed to reason, but you'll find very few people to have a "meaningful" conversation with in that camp.
Do you really think it's meaningless to explore the relationship between critical thinking, radical skepticism, and faith?