View Single Post
Old 11-06-2008, 11:30 AM   #257
smoothmoniker
to live and die in LA
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
Choice #1 - lawmakers decide how the money borrowed/stolen from our future will be spent.
Choice #2 - clutch of bankers decide how the money borrowed/stolen from our future will be spent.
There is a one glaring difference.

Under option 2, we are only at risk if we, individually, decide to put money at risk. Nobody is coming into your FDIC insured savings account and taking away money because the market is down, are they? Nobody is showing up on your doorstep and saying, "Sorry, because of the troubled credit market, we need you to pay 20% more for your mortgage" unless you agreed to let them. Prudence and foresight were sufficient to avoid any direct fallout from this mess.

Option 1 affects everyone, all of us, regardless of our individual responsibility. It obligates the prudent and the fool alike to repay money that only some put at risk.
__________________
to live and die in LA
smoothmoniker is offline   Reply With Quote