Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
Certainly you don't believe for one minute that Obama, or for that matter Clinton did not receive the same treatment. The days of Kennedy are long gone.
|
Bush wanted to use an Authorization of Military Force (AUMF) issued by Congress immediately after 9/11 (and then a second AUMF for the invasion of Iraq) to be able to justify any subsequent action in the name of fighting terrorism, including spying on citizens and denial of basic rights to and torture of detainees.
So he goes to his AG and asks for a legal opinion to justify broader powers than those specified in the AUMF. In my opinion (and I am not an attorney) the resulting memos were crafted in such a way that it provided the plausible deniability ("oh sorry, those underlings who implemented my orders just misunderstood my intent").
And he had the balls to send his staff to get that legal cover while his AG is in a hospital bed groggy from just coming out of surgery.
The role of the AG is to enforce the law on behalf of the "people", not provide a president with justification or lega cover to skirt the law in future actions.
Clinton....show me where he ever asked his AG to write a legal opinion to provide cover for any future actions he might want to take.
Obama...show me where he has done the same in the last two weeks?
Kennedy....I would have been a supporter but I was too young at the time, but I think having your brother serve as AG is a bad idea.