Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
I didn't think this part was serious. My response:
I might feel bad for you after I beat you within an inch of your life, stuff that candy bar you bought up your ass and then held you down so the "old lady" could kick you repeatedly in the balls till the police arrived. Yeah, I'd feel bad, but only for a moment.
But again, thats just me.
|
Don't be stupid. You are fully aware that the point was to show that it can be possible to be guilty from actions of your predecessors when you KNOWINGLY BENEFIT from them. That was the point then and that has always been the point.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Classicman
I took it to the extreme - Now, where do you draw the line?
|
A line cannot exist because it is impossible to not be biased or hypocritical. I try my best not to knowingly benefit from crime but that is still a load of idealistic crap. Take it how you want.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Classicman
You too - see the question mark?
|
What? Just because you have a question mark there doesn't mean you don't imply something. For example
Person A - I believe that marijuana should be decriminalized.
Person B - Do you believe we should start giving heroin away as well?
As you can see, even though Person B asked a question, it was still implied that marijuana decriminalization will lead to the legalization of harder drugs.
In your comment, you made an implication that I was getting at a point where everyone that was around Madoff should be stripped of everything they have, which is absolutely ridiculous. Not only that, the implication is also a straw man.
This happened earlier in this tread as well. Don't make ridiculous statements and hide behind the fact you put a question mark there.
I'm still curious of where you got that from.