Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
Don't be stupid. You are fully aware that the point was to show that it can be possible to be guilty from actions of your predecessors when you KNOWINGLY BENEFIT from them. That was the point then and that has always been the point.
|
I'll try not to be stupid. lol
I got your point. I disagree with you. Have you gotten that yet? I don't know what my great grandparents did and if I found out today that they supplied guns to martians or some other illegal shit I AM STILL NOT GUILTY!
If you find out tomorrow that your education is/was being paid for with drug money from your long lost uncle/father/mother/sister.... Are you responsible or guilty in some way with this newly acquired knowledge?
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
A line cannot exist because it is impossible to not be biased or hypocritical.
|
That is why I took the argument to both extremes. Good job! Welcome aboard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
What? Just because you have a question mark there doesn't mean you don't imply something. For example
Person A - I believe that marijuana should be decriminalized.
Person B - Do you believe we should start giving heroin away as well?
it was still implied that marijuana decriminalization will lead to the legalization of harder drugs.
|
You're paranoid. Actually I see that as "Do you think we should legalize heroin too?"
You have twisted the scenario a bit. Nice try.
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
In your comment, you made an implication that I was getting at a point where everyone that was around Madoff should be stripped of everything they have
|
FALSE. No implication intended. Perhaps my post was not as clear as I thought it was. As I have said that was to establish a point of where the line is drawn. Since you now agree that there can be no line drawn, this has become moot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
This happened earlier in this tread as well. Don't make ridiculous statements and hide behind the fact you put a question mark there.
I'm still curious of where you got that from.
|
I'm not hiding. With respect to the earlier reference with sugarpop. As I stated previously, my intention was to have
her clarify what she was saying. You may choose to believe me or not.