Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
The discussion was changed Bruce, as usual. My opinion was that this is simply adding money to fight a war without it being in the budget. That is all. Which part of that is not clear?
And ot ask for this money just weeks after their own budget for next year is passed is "smokey" at best. It reeks of the same shit as the last administration that they complained about. Is it simply a matter of circumstance and timing? Perhaps, but I am not buying it.
|
The money for the war
is in next year's budget.
That starts in September.
They asked for money to fund the war from when Bush's money runs out (now) until the new budget starts in September.
There is nothing "smokey".
There is no "reeking".
There are no "sheep".
There is no "wonderful rhetoric"
There is, however, a whole thread of pissing and moaning about a problem that never existed.