[henry quirk]

yes it would be

this ((( ))) is what it is...why do some insist on elevating it or expanding it to something it's not?

perhaps i ought to start tallying all the spelling errors that crop up among the posts and harp on the guilty to shape up

would this be acceptable?

or perhaps i can keep a running and public count of inanities as they crop up and admonish the guilty to 'deepen' themselves

would this be acceptable?

i'm certain i would be told to look to content wit5h a kind eye and ignore stylistic eccentricity or sin and personality flaws

why, then, am i targeted because of ((( )))?

easier, i think, to frown on ((( ))) than to counter what's inside ((( )))

*shrug*