Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123
damn those banks for not wanting legislation allowing people who can't afford their homes to keep them.
|
When banks were responsible - did not have a mafioso persona - banks lend only to those who could afford it. Now that they have so many customers that should never be approved, well, it is the customer's fault?
Banks once determined when someone could afford it. Now that the purpose of any company is profits, screw the applicant. Only profits are important.
But again, any company whose purpose is profits therefore deserves to have no profits - and severe punishment.
How curious. Those using extremist politics also advocate a mafia objecctive of profits only - screw the employee, customer, economy, and product. This is Rush Limbaugh’s philosophy that even called Colin Powell a flaming liberal.
Banks that did their job have customers who could afford their homes. Oh. That means the product is more important than profits? A concept so difficult for loyal Limbaugh extremists to admit. Screw the customer. If he cannot afford the house, we will put him there anyway to maximize profits. Extremists say that is good. And now blame the customers for not doing what every bank once had to do when banks had to be responsible.
Clearly that flaming liberal Colin Powell is to blame.