Also...since when was reading an 'infobox elsewhere in the article' considered 'rigmarole'?
How bout people employ a little patience and make the assumption (which will usually be borne out in fact) that if they read the article the context will become clear.
Plus, just a minor point, but you'd also rob journalists and social commentators of what is a commonly used rhetorical device: word confusion *
(*wusion? :P)
|