If they are altering contracts after they are signed or not reducing judgment amounts after re-selling seats, that would be fucked up, but the article is hardly convincing.
The people who signed contracts though.... why is it evil for the Redskins demand payment on them? That's the whole point of a contract. And this isn't about housing, food, medicine... it's fucking football. Pay your debts or your credit goes in the toilet - because you are a proven risk.
Or maybe we need a government agency to examine people's financial records for them and approve or deny any purchases they want to make based on whether they can actually afford it.
