|
In fact, this is from action earlier this year and I do like the fact that it "also set stricter terms for companies bidding to offer such plans in 2010, including a requirement that they can't charge sick, low-income patients more than what they would pay under traditional Medicare."
The partisan editorial suggests that patients "could see higher premiums" bu quoting one provider that is not even certain how or if it will absorb part or all of the increase.
And maybe, in the future bidding process, the insurers will be required to absorb more of the cost, with even stricter regulations and other offsets to protect seniors in the current reform bills.
But, I'm really not interested in responding to every partisan editorial you can find.
|