The Cellar - View Single Post

10-09-2009, 06:33 PM

Yesterday, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct voted unanimously to expand the jurisdiction of the committee's investigation of Rangel.

http://ethics.house.gov/Media/PDF/Ra...Oct_8_2009.PDF

IMO, that is how the process should work...and in the meantime, there is nothing in the current rules/standards that allow for removal from a chairmanship during that process.

What is so wrong about following the rules?

10-09-2009, 06:33 PM	#141
Redux Guest Posts: n/a	Yesterday, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct voted unanimously to expand the jurisdiction of the committee's investigation of Rangel. http://ethics.house.gov/Media/PDF/Ra...Oct_8_2009.PDF IMO, that is how the process should work...and in the meantime, there is nothing in the current rules/standards that allow for removal from a chairmanship during that process. What is so wrong about following the rules?