View Single Post
Old 11-01-2009, 02:28 PM   #427
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
I am not claiming it's in her head. I'm claiming that's possible, maybe even probable, based on what we know.
You have changed your mind! This is HUGE! Originally you said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
She isn't making it up, but it's in her head.
Now you say:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
I am not claiming it's in her head.
*kisses*

We are in agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
You would have to be an expert on dystonia to say what conclusion they could draw. Are you? I am not an expert, but I can easily imagine how the video could have evidence that experts can see, that may not have even been seen by the original doctors; who may or may not have been experts in dystonia themselves (we don't know).
You misunderstood, I am not saying which conclusion they must draw, I am saying it is impossible for them to have come to any conclusion, and they should have admitted that. I do not find it imaginable that a video clip could have subtle evidence for experts to find when the Dystonia Foundation says that multiple, extended psychiatric evaluations are necessary before reaching the conclusion they say they reached in five minutes of video. It's unethical and irresponsible for doctors who haven't examined her to announce to the press that she doesn't have what her doctor says she has.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Wait. You are against diagnosis that doesn't come from direct examination. How is it that you have made this conclusion? Against your own counsel, you are making sweeping assumptions about Desiree's condition.
Her doctor did give her a direct examination. He diagnosed her with dystonia. Until I hear *facts* otherwise, that's the conclusion I'm sticking with.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote