Thread: Pat Condell
View Single Post
Old 01-17-2010, 03:34 PM   #54
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
More so than banning carrying briefcases, gym bags or plain old brown paper bags in public? Why is a veil a greater security threat..other than its association with one particular religion?
It obscures facial recognition software, allows men to pose as women when their only goal is to evade capture, and prevents security video from recording them in accordance with the law.

Quote:
If there was reason to believe that an individual woman posed a security threat based on intel/surveillance connections to a suspected/known terrorists or the individual's previous writing or actions, etc., I would agree.
But if men posed as women with their faces covered you would not?

Quote:
Otherwise, IMO, it is infringing on fundamental rights to practice one's religion as one chooses.
As you pointed out, as long as you do it within the framework of the law, sure. Otherwise comply or go to jail. Pretty simple.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote