Thread: Pat Condell
View Single Post
Old 01-17-2010, 04:32 PM   #3
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
More so than banning carrying briefcases, gym bags or plain old brown paper bags in public? Why is a veil a greater security threat..other than its association with one particular religion?

If there was reason to believe that an individual woman posed a security threat based on intel/surveillance connections to a suspected/known terrorists or the individual's previous writing or actions, etc., I would agree.
ok then it is solved. Intel informs us that this is happening. Men AND women who are known terrorists are using this means to get around the very sophisticated video and other surveillance equipment and personnel used to keep track of them or restrict their movement.
Quote:
Otherwise, IMO, it is infringing on fundamental rights to practice one's religion as one chooses.
It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the war on terrorism.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Good point. Maybe we should ban rucksacks and underpants?
no need, neither of those hide the wearers face.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
So do oversized sunglasses.
Not true. Facial recognition software is VERY sophisticated.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote