Redux

Now you didnt answer my question:

How can you say it is not targeted at one religion when the resolution (evidently, the first step proposed in the Parliamentary process) does just that and makes no mention of security as the reason?

Here's another question.
How do you know that it was politics and not any of the other reasons states (backlash, constitutional guarantees, unworkable)..that went into Sarkosy's thought process that caused him to backtrack from the total ban?


It is simple for me...we should be very careful and proceed in a very deliberative manner before we start taking away guaranteed personal rights and liberties and never do so w/o compelling evidence or intel that it is absolutely required and that results cannot be achieved by any other means.