View Single Post
Old 02-03-2010, 05:28 PM   #12
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Another example of how the more rational (and legal) approach to prevent future terrorist attacks:
Quote:
When the American-born al-Qaida recruit Bryant Neal Vinas was captured in Pakistan late last year, he wasn't whisked off to a military prison or a secret CIA facility in another country to be interrogated.

Instead, the itinerant terrorist landed in the hands of the FBI and was flown back to New York to face justice....

While an American citizen captured in Pakistan certainly presents a unique case, the circumstances of Vinas' treatment may point to a new emphasis in the fight against terror, one that relies more on FBI crimefighters and the civilian justice system than on CIA interrogators and military detention.

Vinas provided "an intelligence gold mine" to U.S. officials, including possible information about a suspected militant who was killed in a Predator drone strike last November, says a senior law enforcement official, one of several authorities who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the case publicly.

Another law enforcement official said that under questioning, the 26-year-old Vinas gradually provided a "treasure trove" of information, allowing U.S. counterterrorism officials to peer deep inside the inner workings of al-Qaida.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=8175862
UG...."You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you to further demonstrate that your "freedom fighter" mentality is not only undemocratic, unethical and of questionable legal footing... but bad public policy."
  Reply With Quote