|
Barro is certainly a qualified and respected economist. He is also widely known as one of the leading anti-stimulus economists and the Hoover institute is a leading proponent of the "tax cuts are better than govt spending" school of economics.
So why do you think Barro's economic modeling is more accurate or less "biased" than CBO economists or Nobel-economist Paul Krugman? Why are CBO studies "government" propaganda and Barro's is not "Hoover/libertarian" propaganda?
|