Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
So what is your point? You think you are more right? You think that some group like ACORN that broke the law is above the laws broken by contractors hired by Haliburton? or that in some way Haliburton condoned the law breaking actions of their subcontractors or that the people actually caught on video who represented ACORN were not responsible for their actions?
You have confused the two organizations and how they are structured. Haliburton subcontracts much of their services, ACORN did not. Not two sides of the same coin.
Your arm chair quarterbacking have no basis in fact unless of course you are going to tell us you worked for ACORN.
I did receive the excellent services of Haliburton on a regular basis while on deployment.
|
My point is simple...apply the same standards to both.
Both received govt funding...one, far more signficantly. Both have engaged in questionable practices...one far more serious (gang rape) and nearly $1 billion in overcharges in the last seven years.
You cant or wont do that.
So Haliburton subcontracts and ACORN has distinct sub-orgs that separate voter advocacy and housing assistance.
One supports the military and one supports disadvantaged minorities (tit suckers)
Why should they not be held to the same standard?
I have never said they should be judged by different standards as you have.