FileNotFound wrote:
Quote:
|
Your logic is horribly flawed.
|
I haven't used any logic to defend the war on Iraq. I indicated that we invaded because we
felt threatened. I substantiated the threat by detailing the substance of the threat and demonstrating that others outside the US agreed that the WMD were there.
And by WMD I refer to nerve gas and other biotoxins outlawed by various international treaties.
That Canada has WMD is no reason to invade Canada because we don't feel threatened. Now if we run out of Molson then I'll lead the charge but to compare a peace-loving country like Canda to a sadistic, blood-thirsty, power hungry tyrant who had already attacked his neighbors is some seriously flawed logic.
I really think it boils down to whether or not the threat was substantial or not. Its easy not to be afraid once the threat has been neutralized. Its not very smart to not be afraid when the threat is real.
You may have the last word - I've said my peace.